Hahahah… It was on "Catch of the Day" (an Australian daily deals type site).
Ideos X1 - Android 2.2 On 11/04/2013, at 7:43 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > Was this on Craigslist? > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:16 PM, tommy-carlos Williams > <to...@devgeeks.org> wrote: >> I saw a 2.2 device for sale the other day. I had a sad. >> >> +1 for dropping it. >> >> On 11/04/2013, at 6:11, Lucas Holmquist <lholm...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> On our AeroGear project, the lowest thing we support on android is 2.3, so >>> +1 for removing >>> On Apr 10, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >>> >>>> Lets give this a few days to make sure we're not about hurt anyone. >>>> >>>> (I'm in favor of removing support.) >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Michael Wolf >>>> <michael.w...@cynergy.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Fwiw I wasn't saying 2.3, but 2.2. The consideration of supporting 2.3 >>>>> goes based on who your consumer base is, and if 2.3 is worth it (had >>>>> several customers recently where this is a serious discussion). AnywhoŠ >>>>> loosing 2.2 I don't think would hurt the community greatly. >>>>> >>>>> mw >>>>> >>>>> On 4/10/13 2:54 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Anyone who thinks we don't need 2.3 support needs to look at what I >>>>>> was considering purchasing for my US phone when on road trips to weird >>>>>> places like Idaho: >>>>> http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/prepay/getPhoneDetail.do?item=prepayIte >>>>>> m&selectedPhoneId=6093&selectedPlanCatId=4997 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Michael Wolf <michael.w...@cynergy.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Generally we are pushing clients to not touch anything lower than 2.3 >>>>>>> (And >>>>>>> having serious discussions about their need for 2.3 support). So from a >>>>>>> cordova users perspective this wouldn't bother me. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> mw >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 4/10/13 2:10 PM, "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Android 2.2 is a pain point because we only have one device in the >>>>>>>> Vancouver office that is on that version of Android (LG Optimus 3D). >>>>>>>> I'm sure that other places have more of them, but they are becoming >>>>>>>> increasingly rare, and I'd rather us only have to test 2.3 and higher >>>>>>>> when we prepare for a release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Braden Shepherdson >>>>>>>> <bra...@chromium.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Do we have a picture of what this would gain us? What are the pain >>>>>>>>> points >>>>>>>>> in terms of bugs or missing APIs between 2.2 and 2.3? I have the vague >>>>>>>>> impression that there are several things, but I actually don't know. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If there are advantages, I'm all for it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Braden >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hey >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Good news everyone! Android 2.2 (Froyo) has dipped below 5%. This >>>>>>>>>> means that we can safely drop support for this version of Android and >>>>>>>>>> set our lower bound to Android 2.3. The cool thing about this is >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> we will only support devices that you can actually buy in a store at >>>>>>>>>> this point, which I think is something that we should aim towards. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Honestly, if Key Lime Pie figured out a way to get 4.x functionality >>>>>>>>>> on single-core devices, that'd be awesome, but I highly doubt it. :( >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So, what do people think about getting rid of Froyo support? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Joe >>>
