+1, I think there's an ASF rule about this somewhere.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > +1, it's a bad excuse on my side but the extra step in opening the link is > sometimes enough to discourage me from even looking at proposals :P > > On 4/5/13 10:18 AM, "Michael Brooks" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hey guys, >> >>I know this has been on the minds of a number of contributors and I want >>to >>bring it up on the list. >> >>I think we need to stop using Google Docs for drafting our plans, >>specifications, and such. >> >>For myself, this is a little disappointing because I like Google Docs and >>I >>think it's easy to comment and amend the document. However, the data is >>not >>hosted by Apache Infrastructure and the changes are not captured on the >>source control, mailing list, issue tracker, or wiki. In other words, it's >>side stepping the regular channels that contributors would monitor. >> >>For future documents, we should be using the wiki. The wiki does support >>rendering comments [1], so we can achieve the same effect as Google >>Docs... >>just in a more awkward way. >> >>Thoughts? If someone can make a compelling case to keep using Google Docs, >>I'm all ears. >> >>Michael >> >>[1] http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/HelpOnComments >
