Joe - my thinking here is that it's fine to re-tag and re-tag until we actually produce an RC with everything tagged. rc2 is still in the process of being tagged, and until the tagging is all done, it just causes more work to scratch it and have to re-tag all of the other repos. Once we create an rc2 archive though, no more adjusting.
Marcel - yes, my intention is to retag the JS with the Android changes, and to update the JS in android repo and then re-tag that as well. Simon was still seeing a bug with one of his projects though, even after the fix, so I'd like to wait for his verification before continuing. On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Michael Brooks <[email protected]>wrote: > Sorry, just catching up on the conversations. > > > > Ey Mr. Brooks do you have a script or something that we can use to > > easily/quickly clone/create the behemoth "tag all the things" parent > issue > > with subtasks in JIRA? This seems like a worthwhile pursuit. > > > Just find go to the parent issue (e.g. Tag > 2.2.0rc1<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1622#>), > click "More Actions", and click "Clone." JIRA will do the rest by spamming > everyone. > > For the most part, I've worded each task in a generic manner, but you may > need to edit the odd sub-tasks description if it mentions a version. > > Michael > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Marcel Kinard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm interested in the latest fix that Andrew put in the js repo: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/**repos/asf?p=incubator-cordova-** > > js.git;a=commitdiff;h=**97a05cb0f672ee1bfb7e9e14a0dfd4**52d7763ba9< > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cordova-js.git;a=commitdiff;h=97a05cb0f672ee1bfb7e9e14a0dfd452d7763ba9 > > > > https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/CB-1745< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-1745> > > > > When I browse the Apache repos, I see that: > > 1) this fix was committed to the js repo after the rc2 tag. Is this > thread > > going to include this fix inside the rc2 tag? > > 2) the corresponding js artifact in the android repo needs to be > refreshed > > to pick up this fix, and I don't see that commit at all. Is someone going > > to do that? And then will the rc2 tag on this repo include this refresh? > > > > Thanks! > > > > -- Marcel Kinard > > > > > > On 10/25/2012 4:03 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote: > > > >> Okay. I'll co-ordinate with Simon on the re-tagging. He's still working > >> through one of the bugs. > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> You just need to delete the tag and re-add it. Then when you push with > >>> --tags it'll move the tag to the newer commit. > >>> > >>> And yeah retagging just android is fine. > >>> > >>> On 10/25/12 12:20 PM, "Andrew Grieve" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> What I think we want to do is just update the existing 2.2.0rc2 tag to > >>>> point to HEAD, unless we want to call rc2 a fail and move to rc3. I > >>>> think > >>>> it'll be fine to re-tag though since only android code changed. > >>>> > >>>> I don't know the git command for it though. git tag --foce 2.2.0rc2. > but > >>>> then how to push it? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> To retag JS, change the value of the VERSION file, then run a build > >>>>> (jake) > >>>>> > >>>>> It will modify the 3 or 4 files that hard-code the version into them. > >>>>> You'll need to follow up the build with a git commit -am 'bumping to > >>>>> 2.2.0rcx' > >>>>> > >>>>> On 10/25/12 12:10 PM, "Andrew Grieve" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Alright. fixed up. JS should be re-tagged (what's the command for > >>>>>> doing > >>>>>> this?) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Joe, do you want to re-tag android after you address CB-1568? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Grieve < > [email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I still need to re-tag android. Just finishing up fixes for CB-1744 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> and > >>>>> > >>>>>> CB-1745 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Cordova-mac, docs and WP7 are all that零 left > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 10/25/12 11:44 AM, "Herm Wong" <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> webOS tagged 2.2.0rc2. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> From: [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:08:38 -0400 > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: 2.2.0rc2 Monday? > >>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected].**org< > [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> If I had know about the bug before you tagged I would have > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> opened an > >>>>> > >>>>>> issue. > >>>>>>>>>> It was exposed by running mobile spec on an Android 2.2 emulator > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> while > >>>>>>>> I > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> was in the gym. Over 50% of the automated tests failed. Basically > >>>>>>>>>> anything > >>>>>>>>>> that was returning a string payload from the Java side did not > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> work. > >>>>> > >>>>>> Simon Mac Donald > >>>>>>>>>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> What bug? Do we have a way to test it? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> We're still in an RC, so it's ok for there to be bugs. That > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> being > >>>>> > >>>>>> said, I wish this was in JIRA so that I knew about it before > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> tagging. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Joe > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Simon MacDonald > >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Okay JS and Android re-tagged to 2.2.0 cause of soem Android > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> 2.2 > >>>>> > >>>>>> craziness. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Simon Mac Donald > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Simon MacDonald > >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>**wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I have to re-tag JS and Android. There is a bug that causes > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> almost > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> everything to fail on Android 2.2. The code is in the > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Android > >>>>> > >>>>>> version of > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> exec so other platforms will not need to pick up the new JS. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Simon Mac Donald > >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Joe Bowser > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > >>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Tagged Android. It's ready to go! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Shazron > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > >>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I'll update the iOS bits right now. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Filip Maj > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > >>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> JS. Mobile spec and hello world app is tagged. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gogo! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/19/12 1:41 AM, "Leutwyler, Markus" > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if you need any help > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Markus > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Filip Maj [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2012 20:47 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected].**org< > [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: 2.2.0rc2 Monday? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That cool? Would be good to get a cordova-js friendly > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> webos > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> out there. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > > >
