I agree too. Mxml has been around for sometime but it is specific to certain 
PMCs and is more a file format like Yaml.

I wonder more about how we classify projects and project product based on 
whether or not the system consists of components and/or a service. Language 
makes more sense for describing components. But this a different discussion.

Best,
Dave

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 7, 2023, at 7:52 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I agree with Sebb, MXML is an XML _vocabulary_.
> 
> Gary
> 
>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, 9:55 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 13:36, Andrew Wetmore <cottag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Apache Royale uses significant numbers of MXML files in applications. Is
>>> that sufficiently different from XML that we should add it?
>> 
>> AFAICT MXML is a domain-specific superset of XML.
>> I don't think that deserves a separate language category.
>> 
>>> <
>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
>>> 
>>> Virus-free.www.avast.com
>>> <
>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
>>> 
>>> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 8:31 AM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> ODBC and JDBC are APIs, not languages, I hope we can all agree on that.
>>>> 
>>>> The "L" in XML and SQL stand for Language, so... ;-)
>>>> 
>>>> Gary
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, 7:24 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> There are currently a few project DOAPs which use languages not in
>> the
>>>>> current valid list.
>>>>> 
>>>>> These are:
>>>>> 
>>>>> BASH/Bash
>>>>> Freemarker
>>>>> Haxe
>>>>> JDBC
>>>>> ODBC
>>>>> SQL
>>>>> XML
>>>>> 
>>>>> Whilst we could add Bash, we might then need to add all the other
>>>>> Shell languages.
>>>>> Freemarker is a templating language; could be added
>>>>> Haxe is a valid language; could perhaps be added
>>>>> JDBC and ODBC are not languages; I think they should be dropped from
>>>>> the classification.
>>>>> SQL and XML can perhaps be considered languages
>>>>> 
>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sebb
>>>>> 
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Andrew Wetmore
>>> 
>>> Editor, Moose House Publications <https://moosehousepress.com/>
>>> Editor-Writer, The Apache Software Foundation <https://apache.org/>
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org

Reply via email to