On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 16:06, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > There are many projects, where “main” contains the latest released version > and „develop“ is for development. > Others use “main” for development and something else for releases. > > That’s why I’m suggesting naming the threads according to what they are used > for. > > “main” for a developer is probably the branch he does his most work on (aka > “develop”). > “main” for a user is probably the branch that he uses for using the framework > (aka “release”). > > With “release” and “develop” I think it’s absolutely clear what is on which > branch.
That is perhaps true for a code repo, though it's unlikely that there will be a single develop branch. Not sure they makes sense for a website repo. > That was why I suggested it. > > Chris > > > Von: tison <[email protected]> > Datum: Sonntag, 2. April 2023 um 14:18 > An: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: Standardise on 'main' as the default branch? > > Name the branch, on which development happens "develop" and the one that > contains the released versions "releases". With "main" you never really > know what it's used for. > > To me, "main" is always "develop". > > Best, > tison. > > > sebb <[email protected]> 于2023年4月2日周日 19:34写道： > > > On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 09:39, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > I would like to make a slightly different proposal. > > > Name the branch, on which development happens "develop" and the one that > > contains the released versions "releases". With "main" you never really > > know what it's used for. > > > > I agree that main is no less ambiguous than master, but the website > > does not really have a development/release cycle, so I'm not sure > > 'release' is appropriate here. > > > > Maybe the default branch should be something like 'production' or > > 'live' for websites. > > However that would mean changing the other repos to keep in step. > > > > > But I think I brought this up multiple times before, so if be +1 on a > > change. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > Chris > > > > > > Gesendet von Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Willem Jiang <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2023 10:19:44 AM > > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: Standardise on 'main' as the default branch? > > > > > > +1 for it. > > > > > > Willem Jiang > > > > > > Twitter: willemjiang > > > Weibo: 姜宁willem > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 8:11 PM sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > All bar one of the 4 comdev Git repos use 'main' as the default branch. > > > > > > > > I think we should standardise on that going forward, and change the > > > > default branch for comdev-site. > > > > > > > > Agreed? > > > > > > > > Sebb > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
