Hi, Christian.

TL;DR: yes. Further details bellow.

I am not an expert, but I will try to comment the most interesting snippets
of the license that may interest you:

*4. Redistribution. You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work or
Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without modifications, and
in Source or Object form, provided that You meet the following conditions:*

   1. *You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a
   copy of this License; and*
   2. *You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices stating
   that You changed the files; and*
   3. *You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You
   distribute, all copyright, patent, trademark, and attribution notices from
   the Source form of the Work, excluding those notices that do not pertain to
   any part of the Derivative Works; and*
   4.
*If the Work includes a "NOTICE" text file as part of its distribution,
   then any Derivative Works that You distribute must include a readable copy
   of the attribution notices contained within such NOTICE file, excluding
   those notices that do not pertain to any part of the Derivative Works, in
   at least one of the following places: within a NOTICE text file distributed
   as part of the Derivative Works; within the Source form or documentation,
   if provided along with the Derivative Works; or, within a display generated
   by the Derivative Works, if and wherever such third-party notices normally
   appear. The contents of the NOTICE file are for informational purposes only
   and do not modify the License. You may add Your own attribution notices
   within Derivative Works that You distribute, alongside or as an addendum to
   the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such additional attribution
   notices cannot be construed as modifying the License. *
* You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and may
   provide additional or different license terms and conditions for use,
   reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or for any such
   Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use, reproduction, and
   distribution of the Work otherwise complies with the conditions stated in
   this License. *


I believe that your necklaces would be considered a derivative work.

Point 4.a: when you sell a necklace, you must send a copy of this license.
If you put the necklace online for free, you must upload a copy of the
license.
Point 4.b: does not apply since you didn't modify files.
Point 4.c: if the font you are using has some notices as "copyright",
"patent", "trademark", etc, you have to send a copy when you sell one. If
you put the necklace online for free, you must retain those notices online.
Point 4.d: if the font you are using has a NOTICE file, you have to give a
readable copy when you sell one.  If you put the necklace online for free,
you must retain those notices online.

About selling, you can sell your necklaces.
About your designs, you are not forced to give them: they are yours and you
can keep them locked and hidden.

Please anyone comment further if I miss something important :)

https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html

Best Regards,

Alfonso Nishikawa


El vie., 2 ago. 2019 a las 13:57, Christian Lehmann (<chelehm...@web.de>)
escribió:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> is it ok to use a font licenced under apache 2.0 licence to creative letter
> necklaces consisting of one single letter?
>
>
>
> Can you help me at this question or tell me who could help?
>
>
>
> With best regards,
>
>
>
> Chrsitian Lehmann
>
>

Reply via email to