On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 12:49, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Sebb,
>
> thing is ... from what I can see in the IoT space, it seems till a week ago 
> no-one was really using the DOAP files for their projects and from looking at 
> the ones I know, it seemed they were pretty outdated. So I intentionally 
> moved the RDF files to a more prominent position.

I don't follow how moving the PMC RDF file makes any difference.
That file does not contain any reference to the IoT space apart
perhaps from the charter.
Generally the PMC RDF file can be created and then left alone.

It's the DOAP files that are important for identifying what products
are available in the various different fields of use.

> Chris
>
> Am 24.04.19, 10:29 schrieb "sebb" <seb...@gmail.com>:
>
>     On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 at 09:08, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> 
> wrote:
>     >
>     > Hi all,
>     >
>     > I’m involved in the IoT track for ACNA and ACEU and was trying to use 
> [1] to find all Apache in the IoT space. At the time I first visited that 
> page, the Apache Ignite project was the only project to be listed there … now 
> the PLC4X and Camel have been added, but it seems most projects are not 
> maintaining their RDP files correctly.
>     >
>     > It would be cool if some people could help with fixing this issue for 
> the projects they are involved with.
>     >
>     > Perhaps as a little help. I did the following for the PLC4X project:
>     >
>     >   1.  Created the two RDF files (PMC description [2] and Project 
> description [3]) which are published through our project website and are 
> available at [4] and [5].
>     >   2.  Registered them in the committees.xml and the projects.xml files 
> here [6]
>     >   3.  Wait at most 24 hours
>
>     There is no need to create a local PMC description RDF file.
>     Most TLPs use the ones at
>     
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/projects.apache.org/trunk/data/committees/
>
>     If yours does not exist yet, just create it and add it to committees.xml
>     There is a template for this purpose:
>     
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/projects.apache.org/trunk/data/committees/_template.rdf
>
>     > Perhaps if you use these as templates, it helps get the files up and 
> running.
>     >
>     > The main reason we chose to maintain these files in our project, is 
> that I have seen quite a lot of projects without maintained RDF files, 
> because they are so invisible to most of the folks … if for example you have 
> a look at the Flex ref file [7], it still mentions Alex as chair, which isn’t 
> the case anymore for more than 2 years now.
>
>     To avoid duplication and staleness of data, it's best not to use the
>     PMC RDF files for anything but the minimum, i.e.
>     id, name and charter
>
>     > Our hope is by managing these resources as part of the normal project, 
> they get a little more visibility and awareness.
>
>     Unfortunately experience shows they still get forgotten, particularly
>     the PMC file (as noted above).
>
>     > Chris
>     >
>     > [1] https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category
>     > [2] 
> https://github.com/apache/plc4x/blob/develop/src/site/resources/plc4x-pmc.rdf
>     > [3] 
> https://github.com/apache/plc4x/blob/develop/src/site/resources/plc4x-doap.rdf
>     > [4] http://plc4x.apache.org/plc4x-pmc.rdf
>     > [5] http://plc4x.apache.org/plc4x-doap.rdf
>     > [6] 
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/projects.apache.org/trunk/data
>     > [7] http://flex.apache.org/pmc_Flex.rdf
>     >
>
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>     To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
>     For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org

Reply via email to