This happened to me with Wikipedia as well – a picture I took myself they tried to say I was copyright infringing. Sigh.
Alternative suggestion here – use Everipedia! ☺ It’s based on Blockchain and super cool. Cheers, Chris From: Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> Reply-To: "dev@community.apache.org" <dev@community.apache.org> Date: Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 2:33 AM To: "dev@community.apache.org" <dev@community.apache.org>, Roy Lenferink <lenferink...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Help with task: Ensure all Apache TLPs have Wikipedia pages Roy, I spoken with the editor concerned [1] and it should be possible for you to recreate the Apache Celix page and any other pages that that editor removed. For future reference in case it helps you or others: The content of all of our web sites is licensed under the Apache License, version 2 unless explicitly stated otherwise. I can't think of any examples of alternative licencing off the top of my head but there might be a few instances somewhere. The ALv2 permits re-use (see sections 2 and 4 in particular). While section 6 of the ALv2 may appear to prevent the use of logos, it does not prevent nominative use [2] and our policy explicitly calls out using the logo in an article to refer to the project as being OK [3]. HTH, Mark [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RHaworth [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/#principles [3] http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/#guidelines On 20/03/18 20:32, Roy Lenferink wrote: Hi, I also started with this task. What should one do to keep the pages to exist? * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Celix * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apache_Celix.png * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Zeppelin * https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Apache_Zeppelin.png And this is going on for all the pages. The response: Looking at the license, material created using the software is released under license. But the license does not appear to extend to their webpages, logos, and so on. Asking for pages to be created is not the same thing as releasing copyright material under a compatible license. Even when using the main project sentence which explains the project which is stored in the official README in the GitHub repository mirror a complaint is filed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Apache_Zeppelin What is probably the best way to resolve this, as the information put on Wikipedia should match the Apache TLP its website. Roy 2018-03-15 18:40 GMT+00:00 Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com>: What I would recommend as a starting point is to go to the Apache Software Foundation wikipedia page, and stub in links to all of the projects that are listed at projects.apache.org On 03/15/2018 05:29 AM, THE THE wrote: I would like to help out with the task listed at https://helpwanted.apache.org/task.html?0b349bee --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
