On Nov 17, 2016 04:03, "Noah Slater" <nsla...@apache.org> wrote: > > He offered to copy the email to the list in the reply I was responding to.
Not directed toward you, but I had thought to bring this up a week or so earlier when I first read their article and other hostile email traffic, and the welcome plenary at ACEU reinforced the need to consider all sides of this issue, especially upon emphasised admonishment of eviction from the venue. Note this tool/shield/weapon is used for the benefit of events and the plurality of their attendees, as well as in questionable or dubious circumstances, in the authors' direct and personal experiences. Not that the possibility of exclusion isn't already printed on every event/theater/public admission ticket, if you squint hard enough at the fine print. > As for the rest, thanks for the clarification. :) And thank you for your thoughts as well. I ask you to not engage me further on this topic, and I will no longer engage with you. Please do accept my apologies for any misunderstanding of using one specific thread, and specific post, to introduce some reflections on this topic, that was inappropriate of me, whether such post was yours or not.
