> On 18 Feb 2016, at 11:57, Sharan Foga <sharan.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> I've been using the notes field to add my comments; It is a bit slower though 
> as the notes field is not included in the main review window.

I overlooked that completely! Thanks for the pointer. It would be indeed way 
more handy if that field was included in the review window...

> 
> Thanks
> Sharan
> 
> Le 18/02/2016 11:49, Jan Willem Janssen a écrit :
>>> On 18 Feb 2016, at 07:52, Justin Mclean<jus...@classsoftware.com>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>>> Rich, I only got access to review ApacheCon (formerly Core) submissions; no
>>>> the Big Data ones.
>>> Same here (I think). If we find  big data talk submitted to core should we 
>>> a)
>>> ask them to be moved to big data OR b) reject them. Seem to recall we had
>>> this issue last time as well.
>> I’ve reviewed a couple of submissions and saw quite a few that should be 
>> moved
>> to BigData. So far, I’ve rejected them and added a “move to big data” as
>> category. I hope that somebody “behind the scenes” is willing and able to
>> move these proposals to the right conference track. It would be a shame if
>> proposals are rejected because they’re submitted to the incorrect
>> conference…
>> 
>> BTW: am I the only one that is missing out on a comment field to add
>> additional comments why I want to accept or reject a proposal?
>> 
>> --
>> Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards
>> 
>> Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect
>> +31 631 765 814
>> 
>> 
>> My world is something with Amdatu and Apache
>> 
>> Luminis Technologies
>> Churchillplein 1
>> 7314 BZ  Apeldoorn
>> +31 88 586 46 00
>> 
>> https://www.luminis.eu
>> 
>> KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93
>> BTW (VAT) NL8170.94.441.B.01
>> 
> 

--
Met vriendelijke groeten | Kind regards

Jan Willem Janssen | Software Architect
+31 631 765 814


My world is something with Amdatu and Apache

Luminis Technologies
Churchillplein 1
7314 BZ  Apeldoorn
+31 88 586 46 00

https://www.luminis.eu

KvK (CoC) 09 16 28 93
BTW (VAT) NL8170.94.441.B.01

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to