Hi Rich, Are there going to be tracks and track chairs? I'm interested in seeing a track on Client-side topics and am willing to help review talks relating to that. If the reviewers need to be Apache-wide, I am probably not be best person for that.
Thanks, -Alex On 2/13/16, 3:57 AM, "Rich Bowen" <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: >Ladies and Gentlemen, > >I appear to have dropped the ball on an important aspect of the >ApacheCon CFP, and your urgent assistance is needed. > >I need a small committee of assistants to help rate the talks and select >the schedule. Please let me know ASAP if you wish to participate. > >A reminder: We license the ApacheCon brand, and the Apache brand itself, >to a third party to produce our event. We act as subject matter experts >for them, but they make all the final decisions. Being on this committee >does not mean that we are running the event, or even making the decisions. > >Note 2: This committee will be much smaller than last year, so please >don't be offended if your offer is politely rejected. Having a huge >content committee caused logistical difficulties in the last few events, >and LF has requested that we have a smaller number of participants this >time. > >Note C: LF is putting in place a new CFP system, so we won't be mucking >about with Google Docs this time, for which I'm sure we're all grateful. >We will, however, need to learn and work with their new system. > >Thanks to anybody that can help in this effort. > >-- >Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen >http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
