Yeah sorry, that was my fault I miss-typed the project address in the original email.
Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: sebb<mailto:seb...@gmail.com> Sent: 8/23/2015 2:45 PM To: dev@community.apache.org<mailto:dev@community.apache.org>; jus...@classsoftware.com<mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ripple Release 0.9.32 Wrong list. The message needs to go to gene...@incubator.apache.org On 23 August 2015 at 22:41, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - signatures and hashed good > - filename contains incubating > - DISCLAIMER exits > - LICENSE and NOTICE good > - no unexpected binaries > - all source files have headers > > I did’t have an environment set that could compile the project. Would be nice > to have pointer on how to set up “jake". > > What's the provanance of these two files? I notice the first can be found > here [1] > ripple-emulator-0.9.32-incubating/thirdparty/dredd.txt > ripple-emulator-0.9.32-incubating/thirdparty/fail.txt > > The header on lib/client/platform/webworks.core/2.0.0/client/utils.js is > probably a little misleading as it contains a mix of licensed code, but not > sure if any changes are required. > > There’s no need (but no issue) for Rico or XMLHttpRequest.js to be included > in LICENSE as they Apache licensed. [2] > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.retrojunkie.com%2fasciiart%2ftvmovies%2fdredd.htm&data=01%7c01%7cRoss.Gardler%40microsoft.com%7cc370faa3bc10413e272008d2ac043503%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=YMVQcEBT%2bOko2wvvzzep14aI8%2fjT4SMl3zoT2gtlWcc%3d > 2. > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.apache.org%2fdev%2flicensing-howto.html%23alv2-dep&data=01%7c01%7cRoss.Gardler%40microsoft.com%7cc370faa3bc10413e272008d2ac043503%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=IP%2fUuMg5hFS6KaNM52bZBTAc4DVNMG1xwjL72wTW1u8%3d
