2015/8/11 上午1:38於 "林晉樟" <line0928769...@gmail.com>寫道：
>
>
> 2015/8/11 上午1:36於 "林晉樟" <line0928769...@gmail.com>寫道：
> >
> >
> > 2015/8/11 上午1:36於 "林晉樟" <line0928769...@gmail.com>寫道：
> > >
> > >
> > > 2015/8/11 上午1:35於 "Benson Margulies" <bimargul...@gmail.com>寫道：
> > > >
> > > > I think it's important to recognize how the board and the foundation
> > > > have handled this issue over time.
> > > >
> > > > The absolute requirement is open decision-making. Avoiding real-time
> > > > communications avoids many possible failures of open
decision-making.
> > > > (Not, of course, all.) After all, the simplest primrose path here is
> > > > two people standing at the intersection of their cubicles. The
policy
> > > > has always been to sternly warn that the use of real time mechanisms
> > > > involves risks of failure, and that failure involves risks of the
> > > > board's blunt instruments being deployed. Does all of this slow down
> > > > some processes, and cause some people of limited patience /
boundless
> > > > energy to get frustrated? Yup, things have costs.
> > > >
> > > > Just writing up the results on the mailing list isn't good enough if
> > > > there is no real opportunity for people to question, deliberate, and
> > > > change the course of action.
> > > >
> > > > You want to have a bar camp, a con call, a slack discussion, a set
of
> > > > messages exchanged by carrier pigeon? Then it's up to you to make
sure
> > > > that you don't end up excluding people from the decision-making
> > > > process.
