Okay, that's fine. Thanks. I'm sure I can find stuff in the archives.
I just wasn't sure what the final reasoning was. NBD.

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii


On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Ross Gardler <ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> That discussion has been had a number of times. We're not opening it again 
> since we are ready to pull the trigger on SF. The archives have the 
> discussion (sorry, not got the time to search them and find links right now).
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher [mailto:ctubb...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2015 12:52 PM
> To: ComDev
> Subject: Re: Moving Apache Extras
>
> It seems to me that moving to GitHub would be easier, since Google put a 
> "Export to GitHub" button on each project page, and I've used it and it works 
> well.
> Perhaps I missed it, but was there a reason why SourceForge was chosen over 
> GitHub? (Just curious... since I have no personal stake in this
> endeavor.)
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hiya folks,
>>
>> I'm the "lucky person" in charge of moving the some 350 projects from
>> Google Code to SourceForge.
>> This will happen over the course of next week, save some freak
>> accident occurs, however, SourceForge is not Google Code, and as such,
>> there are a few things we need to consider:
>>
>> - I will create an admin account that will initially own all the
>> imported projects. This can/will be shared with the ComDev PMC.
>> - Someone (not me!!) will have to step up and help out with delegating
>> read/write access to the new repos on SourceForge.
>> - Preferably, someone will have to go through the giant list of
>> projects, and select those we'll import. This is not strictly
>> necessary, but if someone volunteers for this, that'd be super duper.
>>
>> The most important thing is that we are able to delegate write access
>> to the devs (and do so!), so this does not simply become a big data
>> dump that just sits there. If any of you are interested in taking on
>> that task (preferably more than one person), please do speak up :)
>>
>> With regards,
>> Daniel.

Reply via email to