I think the content on disk should reflect what's in SCM. However,
would it make sense to move to git instead of SVN instead of moving to
trunk subdir?

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii


On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:11 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The reporter.apache.org code on disk has diverged from the copy in SVN.
> There are several files that are not in SVN, and there a several
> differences from the ones that are.
>
> One approach to this might be to copy  the current sources into SVN
> into a new folder.
> Then we can look at merging the current code and redeploying.
>
> I was thinking of using an SVN tag for the deployed source, but the
> SVN directory for reporter.a.o does not use tags/trunk. I could use a
> new directory name like
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/reporter.apache.org-ondisk
>
> but this is not the normal way to use SVN, and might prove confusing later.
>
> So I would like to start by moving the current code under
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/reporter.apache.org
> to
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/reporter.apache.org/trunk
> (i.e. drop it down a level)
> and then use tags/disk-2015-07-06 (or whatever) to record the current setup
>
> Note that the generated data files (*.json) don't need to be stored in SVN.
>
> Thoughts?

Reply via email to