I think the content on disk should reflect what's in SCM. However, would it make sense to move to git instead of SVN instead of moving to trunk subdir?
-- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:11 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > The reporter.apache.org code on disk has diverged from the copy in SVN. > There are several files that are not in SVN, and there a several > differences from the ones that are. > > One approach to this might be to copy the current sources into SVN > into a new folder. > Then we can look at merging the current code and redeploying. > > I was thinking of using an SVN tag for the deployed source, but the > SVN directory for reporter.a.o does not use tags/trunk. I could use a > new directory name like > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/reporter.apache.org-ondisk > > but this is not the normal way to use SVN, and might prove confusing later. > > So I would like to start by moving the current code under > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/reporter.apache.org > to > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/comdev/reporter.apache.org/trunk > (i.e. drop it down a level) > and then use tags/disk-2015-07-06 (or whatever) to record the current setup > > Note that the generated data files (*.json) don't need to be stored in SVN. > > Thoughts?