a. Board is elected annually (semiannually means twice a year, and not "annually or so".
b. On slide 29 you write ActoveMQ in the title. c. On slide 37 "make sue" --> "make sure", also "direcion" should be "direction", "anterprise" --> "enterprise", maybe write "oss" in capital letters, "Push changes to oss back" --> "Push changes back to OSS" d. On slide 40, I think Subversion has "ask and get" committer access, but the 1-2 months is the invitation to PMC. HTH Niclas On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak < krzys.sobkow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Thanks for the hints about existing slides. Here is my presentation: > > http://www.slideshare.net/ksobkowiak/integrate-yourself-with-the-apache-software-foundation-47366192 > . > > I didn't have to much time to check whether there are still any issues > against the ASF policy. I tried to make no > issues. But if you find any please let me know about this. I'll correct > them and re-send the slides to the conference > secretary before this presentation appears on the conference site. > > Feel free to re-use the content. > > Regards > Krzysztof > > On 04.04.2015 23:11, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > > Anyone can do whatever they want with whatever level of attribution they > feel is appropriate where my decks are concerned. No need to complicate > things with policies or best practice guidelines for anyone to worry about. > Just do what feels right. > > > > Thank you for sharing the world of the ASF, I hope my decks can help (I > have many more I'd you are looking for something specific). > > > > Sent from my Windows Phone > > ________________________________ > > From: Shane Curcuru<mailto:a...@shanecurcuru.org> > > Sent: 4/4/2015 1:15 PM > > To: dev@community.apache.org<mailto:dev@community.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: Presentations about Apache Software Foundation > > > > On 4/3/15 11:01 AM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote: > >> My intention is to simply look how other more experienced people do > this. But after Ross's answer a new question was > >> born in my head. What does exactly the Apache License mean for slides? > How can the Apache licensed slides be reused? > >> > >> Regards > >> Krzysztof > > As Ross noted, it doesn't matter what kind of content it is, if it says > > "Apache License 2.0" then it's available under that license, and the > > terms of that license apply. > > > > https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 > > > > In a practical sense for any slides you get from one of these frequent > > Apache speakers on the previous links, that means you're welcome to > > re-use anything in those slides except for the trademarks (i.e. don't > > somehow claim the title or main catchphrase from a previous slide deck > > was your own creation - which is unlikely in any case) for creating your > > own slides or other educational materials. > > > > A best practice is certainly to license your content under the Apache > > license or a permissive style CC license, and to provide some sort of > > credit back if you re-use a bunch of content. > > > > It would be interesting if ComDev wanted to writeup some details of best > > practices for how to provide attribution and licensing metadata in > > common slide creation software, especially Apache OpenOffice. We do > > have plenty of Apache-related presentations that many Apache committers > > have re-used from each other back and forth. > > > > For a legal perspective, you'd need to talk to your lawyer. 8-) > > > > - Shane > > > > -- > Krzysztof Sobkowiak > > JEE & OSS Architect > Apache Software Foundation Member > Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer & PMC chair > Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC < > http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/en/> > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org/qi4j <http://www.qi4j.org> - New Energy for Java
