For ASF events, I believe we use this: https://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/anti-harassment.html
My understanding was that our CoC and our anti-harassment policies compliment each other. But perhaps we want to roll one into the other? On 18 April 2015 at 18:19, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > On 16 April 2015 at 22:41, Shane Curcuru <a...@shanecurcuru.org> wrote: > >> Hey, after an awesome week at ApacheCon, I noticed that we have a >> different published code of conduct for the conference - as the official >> LF site has - than the one we publish for the ASF overall: >> >> >> >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html >> >> Is this something we're interested in changing, i.e. to expand or >> replace the conference one (for future ApacheCon branded events) with >> the overall ASF one? >> > > Formally apacheCON is not our event, we licensed it to Linux Foundation, as > a consequence they define > the CoC (even though I am sure they listen if we have suggestions). > > I will, with my ACEU hat on, talk with LF about how we can enforce, without > being speech police, the CoC. > > Personally I find the LF vesion quite ok, please remember this is not a > matter of wording, but about people > taking action when it happens. > > I think this thread and others have made us all aware of the common > responsibility we share, and awareness > is to me the most important part. > > rgds > jan i. > > >> - Shane >> -- Noah Slater https://twitter.com/nslater
