I think those other comments about Jekyll had to do with keeping all of the site storage on apache servers.
There have been objections in this thread about using github.io based sites even with site name masquerading. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 6, 2015, at 14:36, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > > Regarding some of the other comments about jekyll... it's not true that you > need jekyll. You can publish plain HTML or Markdown also.
