So, the trouble with this process last year was that there were 4
mutually contradictory docs floating around.
On 02/16/2015 03:36 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
It's probably best we start an online doc somewhere...
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 12:29 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Knowing which talks are already claimed by another ApacheCon track?
On 02/16/2015 11:49 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
Hi All
I'm trying to finalise the Content Technologies track for Austin, but
I'm struggling to know which talks have already been "claimed" by
other tracks. Some of the ones I want to include have review comments
which suggest they might have been, and some I'd just guess might be.
I can't seem to see anything conclusive in the review app though.
For the ones overlapping with Science&Healthcare, I'm getting round
this by having the chair of that track just mark up my google doc
spreadsheet with the talks he's already claimed, which just-about
works but may not scale! Is there a more general way I can see what
other track chairs are planning to take?
(If not, I can just send my list of talks, and hope for the best...)
Yeah, that's why I've asked folks to post their proposed tracks here -- because there's
no good way to do this in the CFP itself. I hope that by the next event there will be a
"track chair" access level, where people can claim tracks.
Better yet, if we can persuade LF to open source the CFP system ...
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon
