Hi again. you like testing peoples patience ? I had to search through 3 google sheets to find the information (you did not give the name of your talk).
17 is the number recorded. The data is only available (at the moment) to the people who coordinated ACEU. rgds jan i. On 25 November 2014 at 15:39, Rob Vesse <rve...@dotnetrdf.org> wrote: > jan > > Comments inline: > > On 25/11/2014 14:06, "jan i" <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > >On 25 November 2014 at 12:36, Rob Vesse <rve...@dotnetrdf.org> wrote: > > > >> Does anyone have an attendance figures for last weeks ApacheCon EU > >>since I > >> ideally need to include it in my conference trip report? > >> > >The last number I have was just below 300. Which correspond to the > >expected, but a bit lower than hoped for (helping arrange the conference > >always put the hopes up). > > Thanks for this, I'm not interested in Cloudstack numbers since I didn't > stay for that (my employer is OpenStack focused anyway) > > > > >Remark this number do not include the cloudstack conference (the last 2 > >days). > > > >Living in Europe I of course want ACEU to be at least as big as > >ACNA....and > >we will get there. > > Yes that would be great > > > > >Also one of the conference volunteers mentioned in passing that they were > >> counting attendees in individual sessions. If they were is this data > >>going > >> to be collated and shared anywhere? > >> > > > >Yes these numbers was collected, but are at the moment in a form which is > >not really easy readable and right now there are no plans to put them up > >on > >a web page. > > > >The numbers of the individual sessions also need to be used carefully, and > >first of all they do not express how popular or big a project is. Just an > >example, some sessions are traditionally big in US and small in EU or the > >other way round. > > Understood, the only number I'm really interested in is the number for my > own talk since ideally I need to report that as well. I have a rough > count that I did myself at the time but I'd like it to be as accurate as > possible. > > Is the data somewhere visible to committers? > > Thanks, > > Rob > > > > >rgds > >jan i. > > > > > > > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Rob > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > >
