+1 yes that sounds awesome. We could also get the people from CHLA who use OODT to participate too!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -----Original Message----- From: Pei Chen <chen...@apache.org> Reply-To: "dev@community.apache.org" <dev@community.apache.org> Date: Monday, November 24, 2014 at 5:14 PM To: "dev@community.apache.org" <dev@community.apache.org> Subject: Re: Content tracks at ApacheCon Austin >Is there any interest in having a category for Healthcare? Would be >interesting to see how others use ASF projects to solve different >healthcare issues. >Jay (from BigTop/RedHat) and I (cTAKES) were possibly thinking of doing a >cross project/joint thing on analysis clinical text to demo at Austin... > >On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 11/22/2014 12:28 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: >> >>> What¹s my point of all this rambling? Well, what I¹m trying to say is >>> that having entirely project specific tracks might work well for some >>>large >>> projects, but probably not all. Certainly not for the ATS project. >>> >> >> Totally agreed. Content-category tracks always work better than >> project-specific tracks, where possible, and also have the wonderful >> side-effect of exposing people to projects/technologies that they're not >> already familiar with. >> >> --Rich >> >> >> -- >> Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen >> http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon >>
