The issue is simply that the 2 statements seem in conflict with each other.... Certainly anyone who would attend the keynote would be interested in how to interpret the decision.
On Feb 24, 2014, at 7:28 PM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > I clearly missed a news story. Pivotal are a major sponsor of the event, but > I was unaware of the surrounding circumstances. Jim, I'm in the OHare airport > right now, but I'll call you in the morning if that works for you. > > --Rich > > > On 02/24/2014 12:50 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Will someone tell me that this is a joke: >> >> >> http://apacheconnorthamerica2014.sched.org/event/dc0eda10d1c0cb0f805ced177678e2c2#.Uwuu2dxWmBU >> >> >> Especially considering that such an "expert" also had this >> to say: >> >> "Sometimes, when [a project is taken over] by the Apache Foundation, >> it leads to some strange behaviors in terms of hiring committers, etc," >> Watters said. "The Apache Foundation is fantastic and it works for many >> projects, but we thought for this specific project -- which we want to >> be an industry standard that a lot vendors work on together -- this was >> the right approach." [1] >> >> WTF? >> >> 1. >> http://www.infoworld.com/t/paas/pivotal-spin-out-cloud-foundry-paas-separate-foundation-236913 > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen > http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon >
