We still have to strike a balance at the conference level. I think that the questions to the PMC's will have to be of the form: "We have N submissions in your area, please pick m of these". That will let the PMC's pick within their area while the conference as a whole can find the balance between, say, Mesos and Yarn or whatever other overlapping projects exist.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > On 02/05/2014 12:39 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > >> Generally I am finding the proposals to be pretty good (as they usually >> are). >> >> With respect to de-duping I suggest we stay focused on reviewing talks >> independent of other submissions at this point. It is likely that some of >> the supplicates will just drop out at this first review. Rich can then >> work >> with the appropriate PMCs to de-dupe more fully (Rich I'm happy to help >> with this process) >> > Yes, that will be very helpful. > > > -- > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen > http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon > >
