Agreed! After all, even though Rich is leading this cmmt we *KNOW* that he will have at least 5-6 talks. :)
*duck* On Jan 2, 2014, at 9:32 AM, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > On 12/29/2013 12:56 PM, Mike Drob wrote: >> Rich, >> >> A question about conflict of interest policies. If I plan to submit >> content, can I still be involved in the selection process? I am part of the >> Apache Accumulo PMC. > > I think that we can be professionals and be involved in content selection > even if we've got our own talks under consideration. Now, if you selected all > your own talks and rejected everyone else's, then we might have cause for > worry. ;-) > > --Rich > >> >> Thanks, >> Mike >> On Dec 12, 2013 11:53 AM, "Rich Bowen" <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: >> >>> Dear PMCs, >>> >>> In the coming days, we'll be hearing more about ApacheCon 2014, and what >>> we need to do to make it happen. >>> >>> This time around, we, the folks at the ASF, will be responsible for >>> selecting content, while the conference producer will be responsible for >>> *EVERYTHING* else. >>> >>> Content selection is no small task, and I need help. While there are >>> several people who have already volunteered to be part of a content >>> selection committee, I'd also like to ask each PMC which wants to be >>> represented in the selection process to volunteer one person to represent >>> them in this task. >>> >>> We'll be using the RFP infrastructure supplied by the producer so all >>> you'd be on the hook for is being willing to review a list of talk >>> proposals specific to your project, and voting for/against them in some >>> method which that RFP process provides. Final schedule construction falls >>> to the producer, and, I suppose, to me. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> -- >>> Rich Bowen >>> rbo...@rcbowen.com >>> http://rcbowen.com/ >>> >>> > > -- > Rich Bowen > rbo...@rcbowen.com > http://rcbowen.com/
