Hi, OFBiz is concerned as well. We have several components there and we would like to know if a replacement solution has been planned?
https://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/hosting/search?q=label%3aOFBiz Thanks Jacques On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 3:58 PM luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org>wrote: >> >>> On 28/10/2013 Roger Whitcomb wrote: >>> >>>> P.S. Apache OpenOffice are also concerned, so I have copied them as well. >>>> >>> >>> Thanks. As stated in last July's OpenOffice Board Report: >>> --- >>> OpenOffice, like the ASF as a whole, is hit by the announced policy >>> change of Apache Extras. The project currently stores several libraries >>> there, in an area known as ooo-extras, and the build process downloads >>> them when options like --enable-category-b are used. A solution should >>> be found at the ASF level. >>> --- >>> >>> So basically I have the same questions as Roger: >>> 1) does the Google Code change affect Apache Extras (I was assuming it >>> does)? >>> 2) Are there plans to make the lost functionality available in some other >>> ways? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Andrea. >>> >> >> I either missed or haven't received the announced policy change. Could >> someone please provide a copy. >> >> Thanks >> >> >> > I just found the blog post with the announcement, let me look into it.
