Konstantin Kolinko wrote on Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:31:57 +0400: > 2012/8/13 Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name>: > > I think there are two separate problems here, > > > > 1) Given that an update was sent to committers@, is it ok to quote it or > > summarise it or mention its existence or non of the above > > > > 2) Where should updates be sent to > > > > > > The latter is being debated on infra-dev@. The former I'm unhappy with > > quoting a committers@ annoucement wholesale, that doesn't set a good > > precedent for that (private) list. > > > > There is a policy in ASF, > http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#mailing-list-naming-policy > > [quote] > All PMCs SHALL restrict their communication on private mailing lists > to only issues that cannot be discussed in public such as: > [/quote] > > So I think that Infra members violate the above policy and abuse the > committers list, in the cases when the information is none of the
Infra is not a PMC. If you have concerns with the operation of infra you're welcome to raise them with the the infra team, VP Infrastructure, the President, or the Board.
