On 1 Jul 2010, at 16:19, "Jean T. Anderson" <j...@bristowhill.com> wrote:

> Ping -- is there energy to roll women@ into d...@community?

It depends on what kind of energy you are looking for. If you are looking for 
someone to restart the women@ issues and those issues are about being open and 
welcoming to all then yes, I believe there is energy here. For women specific 
issues I certainly think this is the right place, but there is currently no 
energy devoted to this.

What I personally have energy for is ensuring that women who are active here in 
the ASF are appropriately visible. I have been told by numerous different women 
in IT groups that simply demonstrating there are already women surviving in our 
predominantly male world we will increase the comfort levels for newcomers, 
both male and female. You will therefore find plenty of energy from me in, for 
example, engaging women in the mentor programme. 

Let's make the most of our unusually balanced mix of men and women here. 
 
Sent from my mobile device.


> 
> thanks,
> 
> -jean
> 
> 
> 
> Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Jean T. Anderson <j...@bristowhill.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> | I would like to send a mail to wo...@apache.org suggesting
>>>> | conversations that might "normally"  go to that list be rolled into this
>>>> | one as a central list to discuss all inclusion and outreach issues...
>>>>    ...Have there been any more thoughts on this?  --I think this is a 
>>>> terrific
>>>> idea....
>>>>    
>>> 
>>> When this PMC was created, the board requested it [1] to "take over
>>> the stewardship of the community@ and women@ mailing lists", so I
>>> think we can just go ahead, vote here to fold women@ into this list
>>> and do it.
>>>  
>> 
>> 
>> Sounds good to me.  When the vote starts I'll post a courtesy note to women@ 
>> letting them know.
>> 
>> -jean
>> 
>>> -Bertrand
>>> 
>>> [1] 
>>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2009/board_minutes_2009_11_01.txt
>>>  
>>>  
>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to