Hello, community! I have results: I have rewritten the unit tests in JUnit 5 and they all run and pass. Next step, according to Gary, is to rebase the NetBeans related project files away from the PR. Is these instructions correct for the rebase: https://chatgpt.com/s/t_693544c351308191a5467b6d20d0f856 ?
Best regards, rodde ________________________________ Lähettäjä: Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]> Lähetetty: sunnuntai 7. joulukuuta 2025 3.09 Vastaanottaja: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> Kopio: sebb <[email protected]> Aihe: Re: [COLLECTIONS] JMH benchmark results for IndexedLinkedList vs. ExtendedTreeList Hello Rodion, from mobile (sorry for typos ;) On Sun, Dec 7, 2025, 01:40 Efremov, Rodion <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello again! > > I just noticed that my unit tests are written with Junit4 and the tests in > Collections use Junit5. Might it be the culprit for ignoring my unit tests > even if the test methods are annotated with @Test ? > Junit4 and 5 have differen class for @Test IMO junit versiin should be aligned with the project :) > Best regards, > rodde > ________________________________ > Lähettäjä: Efremov, Rodion <[email protected]> > Lähetetty: lauantai 6. joulukuuta 2025 17.50 > Vastaanottaja: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> > Kopio: sebb <[email protected]> > Aihe: VS: [COLLECTIONS] JMH benchmark results for IndexedLinkedList vs. > ExtendedTreeList > > Hello! > > I just made a PR #664 (branch: add-indexed-linked-list) that contains my > list implementation, ExtendedTreeList (for JMH benchmarking), the actual > JMH benchmark, and a couple of unit test files. > > My current issue is that on my local PC I cannot make the Collections to > run my unit tests. Any advice would be nice to get. > > Best regards, > rodde > ________________________________ > Lähettäjä: Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > Lähetetty: lauantai 6. joulukuuta 2025 15.52 > Vastaanottaja: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> > Kopio: sebb <[email protected]> > Aihe: Re: [COLLECTIONS] JMH benchmark results for IndexedLinkedList vs. > ExtendedTreeList > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 8:50 AM Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 8:38 AM Efremov, Rodion > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > My bad. Could you try that one: > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > Yep, that one works. Thank you. I'll run the benchmarks later today. > > Oh, wait, I'm confusing this thread with another. Where are the > benchmarks? It should be simpler to create a PR at this point. > > Thank you, > Gary > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > ? > > > > > > Best regards, > > > rodde > > > ________________________________ > > > Lähettäjä: sebb <[email protected]> > > > Lähetetty: lauantai 6. joulukuuta 2025 15.10 > > > Vastaanottaja: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> > > > Aihe: Re: [COLLECTIONS] JMH benchmark results for IndexedLinkedList > vs. ExtendedTreeList > > > > > > On Sat, 6 Dec 2025 at 13:04, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 7:41 AM Efremov, Rodion > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hello Gary, > > > > > > > > > > As far as I recall, I have already signed the agreement years ago. > > > > > > > > Hi rodde, > > > > > > > > If you used [email protected] in your paperwork, we don't > > > > have it. Did you use a different email address? > > > > > > If you don't wish to reveal the email address on this list, feel free > > > to send it to the commons private list instead of dev > > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > rodde > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > Lähettäjä: Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > > > > > Lähetetty: lauantai 6. joulukuuta 2025 13.28 > > > > > Vastaanottaja: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> > > > > > Aihe: Re: [COLLECTIONS] JMH benchmark results for > IndexedLinkedList vs. ExtendedTreeList > > > > > > > > > > Hello Rodion, > > > > > > > > > > I think we need you to sign a Contributor Agreement before we can > proceed > > > > > with your contribution. Please see > > > > > https://www.apache.org/licenses/contributor-agreements.html > > > > > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 6, 2025, 02:33 Efremov, Rodion < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, community! > > > > > > > > > > > > In the attachments, you may find a text file summarizing the JMH > benchmark > > > > > > of my IndexedLinkedList vs. ExtendedTreeList [1]. It turned out > that my > > > > > > list implementation easily outperforms [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? Should I do a PR? > > > > > > > > > > > > References: > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > https://github.com/coderodde/IndexedLinkedList/blob/main/src/main/java/io/github/coderodde/util/ExtendedTreeList.java > > > > > > > > > > > > PS. ExtendedTreeList is a subclass of TreeList that implements > some > > > > > > essential missing methods such as subList(..., ...).clear() and > so on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
