Hi Gary,

On 4.12.2025 17:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner than 72 hours from now.
> 
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...


I performed the following checks:

- Verified the checksums of the artifacts.
- Verified the signatures on the artifacts.
- Ran the test suite:
    Tests run: 1838
    Failures: 0
    Errors: 0
    Skipped: 3
- Verified reproducibility with JDK 25 and timezone set to UTC. The
  binaries are reproducible, but the SBOM contains incorrect checksums
  for `commons-lang3` version `3.20.0`, likely due to a trailing RC in
  your local Maven repository.
- Verified the japicmp report against the release notes. A small note:
  `RELEASE-NOTES.txt` is served as ISO-8859-1 (the HTTP default), so the
  Hangul characters in 김민재’s name appear distorted.
- Verified the RAT report: the three files with unapproved licenses are
  two binary fuzzing blobs and a CSV file. The latter could potentially
  receive a license.

Overall, +1: release the artifacts.

Piotr

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to