On Mon, Nov 10, 2025, 08:02 Henri Biestro <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for the review and the catch.
> My bad, I incorporated some grammar changes to get us closer to using
> javacc 6.0; this resurrected another case of 'block vs set' ambiguity.
> I agree that whether or not an annotation is present should not change the
> nature of what is evaluated; but annotating a block containing one
> expression should be favored over annotating a set literal.
> I'll restore the previous behavior and will try finding a 'better' rule.
> Cheers
> Henrib
>

Thank you Henri. I'll cut a release candidate when you're ready. It feels
like we are missing a test or set of tests for this type of use case.

Gary

>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to