I'll have a look at this momentarily.
Before we cut 3.6, I need to commit a few changes wrt switch/JEXL-440 anyway.
Cheers

On 2025/11/02 13:14:55 Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All, and Henri B in particular:
> 
> (By user request), I was about to cut a release candidate for 3.6.0 BUT:
> 
> There is a binary compatibility breakage in master vs. 3.5.0:
> 
> - final public class org.apache.commons.jexl3.JexlFeatures
> REMOVED public static final int STRICT_STATEMENT
> 
> commit c224a05a0a75b05dc19c965519d8a6424e55d4cf
> Author: Henrib <[email protected]> 2025-06-06 15:17:27
> Committer: Henrib <[email protected]> 2025-06-06 15:17:27
> 
> @@ -127,4 +127,4 @@
>      public static final int REF_CAPTURE = 24;
> -    /** Captured variables are reference. */
> -    public static final int STRICT_STATEMENT = 25;
> +    /** Ambiguous or strict statement allowed. */
> +    public static final int AMBIGUOUS_STATEMENT = 25;
>      /**
> 
> Unfortunately, this is hidden by:
> 
> <breakBuildOnBinaryIncompatibleModifications>false</breakBuildOnBinaryIncompatibleModifications>
> 
> and undocumented in changes.xml.
> 
> We should strive to avoid breaking binary compatibility within a major
> release, and if we do, it must be justified and documented.
> 
> Please explain and/or revert.
> 
> Curiously, JApiCmp complains about:
> 
> - org.apache.commons.jexl3.introspection.JexlUberspect$ClassNameResolver
> REMOVED public abstract java.lang.String resolveClassName(java.lang.String)
> 
> BUT, it looks like ClassNameResolver was added since the last release,
> but is documented as added in 3.3 (@since 3.3). This must be some odd
> bug in JApiCmp, or, am I missing something?
> 
> ClassConstantResolver and ConstantResolverFactory were also added, but
> not documented with @since 3.6.0.
> 
> I propose:
> - RESTORE the constant STRICT_STATEMENT. What does this mean for the
> other constants in the class, like ALL_FEATURES?
> - REMOVE the property override breakBuildOnBinaryIncompatibleModifications
> - Javadoc the new interfaces with @since
> 
> Thank you,
> Gary
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to