On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 8:10 AM Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I think we can do document R7 as the baseline in the Javadoc overview page.
For example, something like this: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/blob/master/src/main/javadoc/overview.html Gary This will evolve as each version is released and we can track the most important requirement: the Java platform. Some people will also want to know the Android API version but that's a hard one to finally out unless Android has a tool for that. > > For more compelling arguments to stay on R7, see comments from laeubi > : > https://github.com/apache/commons-parent/pull/676#pullrequestreview-3375101757 > > Gary > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2025, 04:49 Piotr P. Karwasz <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> On 23.10.2025 08:56, Subrhamanya Hebbar wrote: >> > Now I want to understand is there any possibility to conclude what the base >> > OSGI version needs to be? >> >> I reached out to an OSGi expert for an external opinion, and the >> recommendation was not to use OSGi R6 as a baseline going forward [1]. >> Based on that, I’m inclined to propose that we officially state that >> Commons libraries require OSGi R7 or newer, which matches the behavior >> of recent releases. >> >> If there is agreement, I can prepare a documentation update. Where would >> be the appropriate place to define this? >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Piotr >> >> >> References: >> [1] >> https://github.com/apache/commons-parent/pull/676#pullrequestreview-3375101757 >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
