On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 5:07 PM Rob Tompkins <chtom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 7, 2025, at 5:58 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 3:46 AM Piotr P. Karwasz
> > <pi...@mailing.copernik.eu> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Gary,
> >>
> >> On 6.08.2025 00:00, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>> In both branch 1.X and master, the class ConstructorUtils is unused
> >>> and duplicates APIs in Commons Lang.
> >>>
> >>> I propose to drop it from master, which will be 2.0 when finalized.
> >>
> >> What should be the demarcation between Commons Text, Commons Lang, and
> >> Commons BeanUtils:
> >>
> >> - Operations on Java primitive values, arrays, and locale-independent
> >>  strings used in configurations or business logic clearly belong in
> >>  Lang.
> >>
> >> - Handling of text for UI display belongs in Text.
> >>
> >> - String interpolation also falls under Text.
> >>
> >> - Everything that deals with `java.beans` should be in BeanUtils.
> >>
> >> - I’m less certain about reflection logic: BeanUtils feels like
> >>  the natural home, although Lang currently also contains duplicates of
> >>  it.
> >>  I looked at the history and classes like `MethodUtils` appeared in
> >>  BeanUtils two years before they were moved to Lang (2008 vs 2010).
> >
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > Thank you for your digging in the history.
> >
> >> in
> >>  BeanUtils two years before they were moved to Lang (2008 vs 2010).
> >
> > That tells me we can complete this move for BU 2.0. Since all
> > reflection business happens in `java.lang.reflect` and Lang rightly
> > has much more comprehensive support for `java.lang.reflect`, that's
> > where the code belongs IMO. This can leave BU to _focus_ on the
> > `java.beans` aspects.
> >
> > The fact that `ConstructorUtils` is not even used by BU itself is also
> > an indication that users who want this functionality can get it from
> > Lang.
>
> +1 for deprecation. Particularly if duplicated in Lang.

I agree; I'll make sure to deprecate it in 1.x and remove it from git
master for 2.0.

Gary

>
> >
> > TY,
> > Gary
> >
> >>
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to