No reason aside from the fact that the code base is not fully modernized. You could also ask if Converter should extend BiFunction.
I would like to create a release candidate for a 2.0.0-M1 release soon. This would unlock a lot of other work down the line. One item holding us back is that BeanUtilsBean2 extends BeanUtilsBean where there should only be one class. There are likely a few more cleanups that need to happen. I've removed most of the deprecated code. Gary On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 3:12 AM Claude Warren <cla...@xenei.com> wrote: > > I am looking at BeanUtils as part of the CLI options to parse a command > line option string into a class. > > I see that Converter is an interface with one method; converting a String > to an Object. Is there a good reason for this not to be annotated as > an @FunctionalInterface? > > Claude > -- > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
