On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 14:21, Alex Herbert <alex.d.herb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 13:20, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > What's the best way to document this do you think? > > That lang is tested (and so should be built) with the latest JDK of > the respective stable release (8, 11, 17, 21)? > > This could live on the README in the GH repo. This would require an > update to the commons-build-plugin that generates it.
The build plugin includes the POM description text, so it can be added there. > But for a start > we can add a few sentences to the lang README under the building > section: > > "The code is tested using the latest revision of the JDK for supported > LTS releases. Please ensure your build environment is up-to-date and > kindly report any build issues." > > This should provide a first indicator to a user that the JDK must be > up-to-date and welcomes any feedback on building. This text may not be > suitable for all repos if they do not test across all LTS versions of > the JDK so may need some revision for the build-plugin. > > Alex > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
