As a consumer, I would prefer all java version changes to be considered major breaking changes for all apache commons components. I've waste lots of hours trying to find the oldest released version that supports a specific java version as the project can't yet upgrade for various reasons.
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 at 15:49, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 at 15:37, Elric <el...@melnib.one> wrote: > > > > On 15/10/2023 16:31, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > A major version bump is rather heavy handed when no one is asking for a > > > "real" 2.0 with breaking changes. > > > > Agreed. My 2 cents: a minor version and a clear release note is plenty. > > Critical bug fixes can still be made by bumping the patch version, > > Are you sure about that ? > Has that been tried? > > > though given that Java 8 is nearly ten years old, it's really time for > > folks to upgrade. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
