On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 at 16:25, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi. > > Le dim. 1 août 2021 à 02:57, Matt Juntunen <matt.a.juntu...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > > Hello, > > > > I've addressed a few issues since I last proposed the commons-geometry > > 1.0 release, namely > > - reducing the code smells in SonarCloud from 100+ to 8 (mostly by > > clearing false positives) and > > - removing use of checked exceptions in the IO modules (GEOMETRY-138). > > Thanks! :-) > > > I've also run fuzz testing locally on the IO modules and am pursuing > > integrating the project into OSS-Fuzz. So, how are we feeling about a > > 1.0 release? > > We should wait for some positive feedback from the code being > exercised by that new tool. [I've no idea of how long is long enough.] > > Then, as a matter of preference, I'd still suggest that "Commons RNG" > be released first (if the latter's next release is pending). > I think that RNG can be released as there is nothing pending to add. I've updated the user guide with the latest performance tests and new API additions. I have not yet checked the new API to make sure all is OK with the new method signatures and class names. Alex
