Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 14:42, John Patrick <nhoj.patr...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > If the tests are valid and useful once post Java 1.8, what about > starting the next release branch where the min version bumps to Java > 11.
[Numbers] and related components were meant to replace and improve some functionalities provided in [Math] v3.6.1 whose target was Java 5 (!). A few years ago, the bump to Java 8 was considered a bold move (for "Commons"). :-} If we are sure that Java 11 is no problem for anyone who'd go through the upgrade effort, then indeed why not? Gilles > As Java 17 starting ramp down starts today I believe so in 3 months we > will have 3 LTS (1.8, 11 and 17) releases. So technically Java 18 > development starts tomorrow and I expect 1.8 will be dropped shortly > from backwards support as they want to get off the classpath fully and > onto the modules path. > > Anyway, just a thought. > > John > > On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 12:05, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Thanks. > > > > I've updated the RELEASE-NOTES accordingly (feel free to tweak the text) > > > > On Thu, 10 Jun 2021 at 00:58, Alex Herbert <alex.d.herb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I have removed the requirement for Java 9 from the build. It is still used > > > in the performance testing module. > > > > > > Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
