On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 00:35, Matt Benson <mben...@apache.org> wrote: > > FWIW, my recollection is that proxy was ready for a 2.0 release which was > vetoed on the basis that the site didn't contain a migration how-to > document. Oh well.
I don't think it was vetoed, but it looks like there were only 2 +1 votes: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/45e87021355c0c1ae1d0b6d1db601bf33a2aecaad0ee240dc0d2e1ca%401396900218%40%3Cdev.commons.apache.org%3E Given that there have been no significant activity or enquiries since then, I wonder if it is worth the effort. As a minimum the site would need to be rebuilt, dependencies updated etc. Sebb. > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021, 4:07 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sounds reasonable to me. > > > > Gary > > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021, 16:09 sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > There has been no substantial development for several years, and only > > > two open JIRA feature requests. > > > > > > The website is outdated, and needs regeneration. > > > > > > Is it worth spending any time on this component? > > > > > > I suspect it should go dormant. > > > > > > Sebb. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
