On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 10:08 PM Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote:

> OTOH I'm not sure I understand the requirements of OSS-Fuzz. I haven't
> read the docs only looked at the image of the process. Seeing a
> Sheriffbot tracking deadlines makes the me very uncomfortable. I'm a
> volunteer and so are most others around here.

The disclosure policy for OSS-Fuzz is detailed here:
https://google.github.io/oss-fuzz/getting-started/bug-disclosure-guidelines/
Reports will become public after 90 days (plus a 14 day grace period
if a patch is close to being released).

>
> > All I would need from you is a list of emails to which the automated
> > bug reports should go. The reports are usually directly actionable as
> > they include stack traces and minimized reproducers.
>
> In general I'd think the notifications list of the Commons project would
> be a the best fit. Of course the nature of the issues detected could
> lead to the fuzzer uncovering security critical bugs that we may not
> want to become public before a release fixing it has become available.

I am currently working on improving the automatic security/severity
analysis of Java findings in OSS-Fuzz, which should help prioritize
the security-relevant bugs (e.g. OoM, infinite loops) over the less
important ones (e.g. undeclared exception).
However, afaik the list of email recipients for a bug currently can't
depend on the security content of the bug, so it might be better to
choose a private mailing list here.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to