I believe Simon was referring to:
https://jspecify.dev/
https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify
The table that shows the participants is not being displayed currently
(just me?), one can view the source though:
https://jspecify.dev/_sources/index.rst.txt
Worth checking this related thread too:
https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2960
Best regards.
On 07/02/2021 23:37, Gary Gregory wrote:
Isn't the root issue is that all toolchains need to agree on the new
annotations? What's that going to be?
On Sun, Feb 7, 2021, 17:56 si...@ochsenreither.de <si...@ochsenreither.de>
wrote:
Agree on that – adding a dependency on the JSR-305 jar is a really really
bad idea for all the reasons already outlined. I'll add another one:
At my place, we have actively been removing any usage of these annotations
as you simply can't use these annotations and the "real" javax.annotations
package (javax.annotation:javax.annotation-api) under the module system
(that was introduced in Java 9, for the record).
People are already working on a replacement library (Jetbrains, Google,
others), but I forgot the exact URL due to a lack of interest.
(The JSR-305 approach to nullability is wrong, broken, and will never work
reliably from my POV.)
Cheers,
Simon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
