Agreed on the GitHub Actions. Neutral about how snapshot sites are published since there are multiple methods of doing the same thing, though if that's also simple to set up via the action to commit the output to the gh-pages branch, I'd say go for it!
On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 at 13:07, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > In order to ease maintenance, I propose that we drop Travis CI in favor of > Apache CI and GitHub Actions. 2 CI systems instead of 3 seems like plenty > to me. The exception would be a component with an existing complex Travis > build that was not or cannot be reproduced in GitHub Actions. > > Looking ahead, I think we should consider publishing SNAPSHOT sites to > GitHub.io. > > Gary -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
