> On Jul 26, 2020, at 7:17 AM, Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> For examples about my prs at commons-lang,if my memory is correct, only
>>> gary (and sometimes kinow) reviewed my prs, and I don't think we have
> only
>>> two committers in commons-lang.
>
>> Are there JIRA reports?
>
> My log here is:
>
> LANG-1545 merged by gary
> LANG-1561 merged by gary
> LANG-1563 merged by gary
> LANG-1562 merged by gary
> LANG-1564 merged by gary
> LANG-1560 merged by gary
> LANG-1552 merged by gary
> LANG-1553 merged by gary
> LANG-1554 merged by gary
> LANG-1555 merged by gary
> LANG-1558 merged by gary
> LANG-1559 merged by gary
> LANG-1556 merged by gary
> LANG-1565 merged by gary
> LANG-1557 merged by gary
> LANG-1546 merged by kinow
> LANG-1549 merged by chtompki
Solid work pulling this out. Thanks!
-Rob
>
> pending:
> 10+ sub-quests in LANG-1573 pending, for near 1 month already. most of
> which is performance refines in StringUtils.
>
> I'm not requesting somebody must review my pr now or something.
> And I know committers are busy.
> I say this just for showing, in my view, we really have no enough reviewers.
> And if somebody has any ideas about how we can solve this, by making more
> reviewers or making current non-active committers more active, or other
> more advice...
>
> Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> 于2020年7月26日周日 下午5:27写道：
>
>> 2020-07-26 5:00 UTC+02:00, Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com>:
>>>> GitHub is basically our interactive pull request interface. If we didn’t
>>> have that, I bet we’d be running GitLab ourselves or similar.
>>>
>>> Yes, that is what I think gitbox lacks.
>>
>> As Matt says above, the functionality is there. As noted in my
>> previous message, my understanding is that the GitHub mirroring
>> was chosen (by Apache INFRA) specifically and exclusively for its
>> ability to provide that functionality.
>>
>>> Cannot imagine a git-based website having no convenient pr system...
>>
>> The purpose of a web viewer that display Apache's repositories
>> is different (e.g. I use it to provide links in discussion on here or
>> in JIRA).
>>
>>>> Also, being that the bar to be a committer here is fairly low, getting
>>> access to gitbox directly isn’t too difficult.
>>> This is decided by what you mean 'low'...
>>
>> Matt's statement allows for a lot of interpretation. ;-)
>> But it's another discussion...
>>
>>> As far as I can see in my prs, most of the time I need to wait for very
>>> long to get reviewed.
>>
>> The probable cause is the lack of time on the part of those
>> who are the primary maintainers of the component.
>>
>> Another could be that is has been forgotten. If you think
>> that it might be the case, you can send a nudge here.
>>
>>> I think that can indicate the fact that we have no enough committers(or
>> no
>>> enough reviewers).
>>
>> Indeed, there aren't enough active committers.
>> As Stefan indicated:
>> 1. the "Commons" team has dwindled and
>> 2. new contributors often don't stay around enough to show
>> a sustained interest in any component such that the primary
>> maintainers feel confident to give them write access.
>>
>>> Or, quite some committers only focus on their own prs, but not do any
>>> reviews?
>>
>> There are so many components that most committers
>> feel confident to make significant changes only in 2 or 3.
>>
>>> For examples about my prs at commons-lang,if my memory is correct, only
>>> gary (and sometimes kinow) reviewed my prs, and I don't think we have
>> only
>>> two committers in commons-lang.
>>
>> Are there JIRA reports?
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>>>> [...]
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
