On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 6:51 PM Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2020-07-23 0:14 UTC+02:00, Torsten Curdt <tcu...@vafer.org>: > >> > >> You act, and I must react? > >> Do I really have to spell it in even more words than > >> above? > >> > > > > You just sent me a message I didn't want - and I need to delete it now ;) > > > > But tongue in cheek aside. We are on a dev list. > > Commits, issues all generate traffic that are caused by other people. > > I'm sure that you see the difference between a bot-generated > message and a post by a human. > > > If you are not willing to deal with that, we might have very different > > expectations. > > My expectations did not change, as I explain in the [VOTE] thread > about the purposes of "issues@". > I've always considered issues@ for automated emails, first from Jira, then svn, then git. Have you ever seen a human post to @issues? Gary > > I've no problem with people wanting more bot-generated email, > but then *they* change their expectations, and they should adapt > (in this instance, by using a new ML). > > Gilles > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
