>
> > It does not mean that a source distribution goes away.
>
> Nor did I mean that it would.
> I commented on the remark that one's own computer
> supposedly did not matter.
>

Ah, then it was only the  "(that one does not really count.)" that didn't
sit well with you. Misunderstood.



> > We have been distributing binary builds for years.
>
> Officially, for convenience (but that's not the point).


> The point is that the distributed files do not come from
> CI builds, but from one performed on the RM's machine.
>

I realize that a local build seems to be your gold standard.
That's a very debatable point of view.



> In this instance, I don't see why I should
> adapt to a flood of messages that was never discussed since
> I've been asked to subscribe to "issues@".
>

The "flood of messages" could have been commits, people discussing issues
or asking questions.

Deleting the messages should have been 10s max.
I wonder why you choose to be outraged instead.
Just put in perspective the time you spend on this thread already.


> Why? The CI/CD system should not matter.
>
> Sure.  It's a convenience configured by each developer or team,
> as they see fit.
> So, why the original post recommending to favour GitHub?
>

Probably because it is prefered by the original poster?



> > Are we talking about changing that?
>
> The problem (of today namely) is that we don't talk.
> The process for using GitHub was not discussed either.
>

You mean for the automatic dependency PRs? or in general?



> For me, anything that comes through GitHub is a burden,
> a loss of time.  I can imagine that it is a boon for others
> but is this an Apache or GitHub project?
>

I guess there are many people out there that like it as a tool.
Maybe you could explain why it's a burden for you?



> > As long as we keep one egg (the sources) the other eggs don't really
> > matter.
> > Could you explain the problem with the basket?
>
> As said above, GitHub is inconvenient for me; thus any move
> that assumes otherwise, I don't agree with.
>

Not sure you represent the majority, so maybe elaborate on
the inconvenience.

Reply via email to