If you are referring to the class org.apache.commons.jexl3.internal.Options
Is binary compat required for an internal class? On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 10:20, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > I do not think your changes to JexlOptions are binary compatible so -1 :-( > > Gary > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019, 17:01 <hen...@apache.org> wrote: > > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > > > henrib pushed a commit to branch master > > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-jexl.git > > > > > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: > > new 753d6e6 JEXL-307: tidy API (made JexlOptions a concrete non > > derivable class), try to ensure lexical interpretation on lexical > feature, > > allow runtime options to be controlled through pragma (jexl.options) Task > > #JEXL-307 - Variable redeclaration option > > 753d6e6 is described below > > > > commit 753d6e634d94022871b481896db78e323d7ccfed > > Author: henrib <hen...@apache.org> > > AuthorDate: Tue Nov 12 23:00:39 2019 +0100 > > > > JEXL-307: tidy API (made JexlOptions a concrete non derivable class), > > try to ensure lexical interpretation on lexical feature, allow runtime > > options to be controlled through pragma (jexl.options) > > Task #JEXL-307 - Variable redeclaration option > > <snip>
