On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 08:53, John Patrick <nhoj.patr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> what about people wanting to use it on java 12 or java 13.

Please explain what you mean.

Are you saying that code compiled with Java 5 will not run on Java 12+ ?
Is not, why not?

> if java 1.5 and not wanting to upgrade is the argument, why would they be 
> upgrading the software...

It's very different upgrading a single component as opposed to
upgrading the JVM which runs multiple components.
Much easier to test and revert.

> if a company is choosing to use and run an out of support jvm’s then it is a 
> risk they are choosing to accept, either implicity or explicitly.
>
> maven and modules are two different things, in a few releases time the 
> classpath disappears and so any framework/jar that has not upgraded won’t 
> execute on the modern and current jvm.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 10 Oct 2019, at 08:40, Luis Panadero Guardeño 
> > <luis.panad...@digibis.com> wrote:
> >
> > The problem sometimes not are the developers and their desire of 
> > upgrading. The problem are the clients that don't desire to upgrade the JVM 
> > that have installed in their servers.
> > I had a case where a client was running a Sun Java 5 JVM with a bug on 
> > String class that sometimes calculated bad string lengths and was making to 
> > our product to fail. The solution was to updated to a more modern JVM, but 
> > they don't like to do it.
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > De: Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com>
> > Enviado: jueves, 10 de octubre de 2019 8:16
> > Para: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org>
> > Asunto: Re: [exec] Update from Java 5 to 6
> >
> > +1 for java 8
> > I just assume developers who still using java 6 do not care about
> > upgrading their commons too...
> > But what is the meaning of jigsaw....I mean, everybody use maven and
> > maven is good, right?
> >
> > sebb <seb...@gmail.com> 于2019年10月10日周四 上午6:55写道:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 22:38, John Patrick <nhoj.patr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Regarding the question, it was by Simon Ritter (Azul Systems
> >>> previously Oracle previously Sun). "Put your hand up if your running
> >>> applications in production using Java X", started with Java 8, then
> >>> asked about 11, then 12 and 13, then asked 7 and then 6. Not sure if
> >>> he said Java 5 but I don't think he did.
> >>
> >> OK, thanks.
> >>
> >>> It's great java is backwards compatible, but Java 5 was EOL 2009, Java
> >>> 6 was EOL 2013, Java 7 was EOL 2015, java 8 EOL 2019 personal usage
> >>> 2020 and AdoptOpenJDK 2023).
> >>>
> >>> People jokes and complained about Java was dead or slow and releases
> >>> took 2-5 years... JPMS has now been released for 2 years and how many
> >>> frameworks/applications have actually release a version where you can
> >>> take advantage of modules and create real lightweight images.
> >>
> >> Most of Commons components are quite small, so is this really a concern?
> >>
> >>> I've been using Java since 1.1, I was annoyed major releases took
> >>> ages, but I'm more annoyed about the whole java ecosystem not stepping
> >>> up as they have got use to the previously slow release cycles. I
> >>> realise OpenSource project is done in peoples spare time and they are
> >>> choosing to participate, but I've tried with multiple projects to
> >>> raise pull requests to help taking the next steps.
> >>>
> >>> My personal view is all commons projects should aim from Jan 2020 to
> >>> bump to creating multi release jars of Java 8 and Java 11, so people
> >>> using Java 8 are still supported and people using Java 11+ can uses
> >>> modules.
> >>
> >> And anyone using Java 7 or earlier is excluded.
> >>
> >> Unless I am mistaken, if we don't create these multi-release jars,
> >> people will still be able to use existing releases.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 18:21, Alex Herbert <alex.d.herb...@gmail.com> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 09/10/2019 14:12, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'd like to update Commons Exec from Java 5 to 6 to get it to build on 
> >>>>> Java
> >>>>> 11.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Gary
> >>>>
> >>>> Gary changed git master to update to 1.6 but travis was not able to
> >>>> build for older JDKs.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have tried following the recommended instructions for their trusty
> >>>> distribution to use JDK 6 [1]. This did not work [2]. It would appear
> >>>> that travis cannot support openjdk6 any more.
> >>>>
> >>>> Using 'dist: trusty' allows a clean build on JDK 7, 8, 11.
> >>>>
> >>>> I recommend dropping openjdk6 from the build matrix.
> >>>>
> >>>> Other items from the .travis.yml are the broken configuration for the
> >>>> coveralls report. This can be fixed separately as the pom needs some
> >>>> updating.
> >>>>
> >>>> Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>> https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/reference/trusty/#jvm-clojure-groovy-java-scala-images
> >>>>
> >>>> [2] https://travis-ci.org/apache/commons-exec/builds/595713743
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to