I’m generally a +1 for this change. I think that minimal upgrades to 3.X are a good idea. So long as other folks are at least a -0 on 3.X changes, I’m happy to help with release preparations.
-Rob > On Sep 16, 2019, at 11:58 AM, Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote: > > I've started to try and get a release out on the branch to get the > Java module name in. Since I haven't committed in many years this > isn't going to be easy. > > I've successfully pushed a small fix directly to the MATH_3_X branch. > I've seen something suggesting that branches can't be deleted, which > makes me concerned, although I was able to delete my branch. Can > branches actually be deleted on git? > > I've tried to bring the branch up to date with the v48 parent, https > and so on, but would appreciate someone more knowledgable checking for > anything stupid: > https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/113 > > The build passes on Travis, but it doesn't look like the Jenkins build > is triggered except by commits on MATH_3_X itself. And since I can't > see the setup of the Jenkins build, I have no way of knowing if I have > actually fixed the Jenkins build. Am I missing something? > > In general, are we pushing straight to "master" or using PRs? > > thanks > Stephen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
