I'm sorry, I'm following a list and I had no idea there were many occurrences 
of the same mailing list.

>     Il 31 luglio 2019 alle 13.35 Gary Gregory < garydgreg...@gmail.com 
> mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com > ha scritto:
> 
> 
>     Fernando,
> 
>     You are posting the same message to the same mailing list with different
>     subjects. Once is enough IMO.
> 
>     Gary
> 
>     On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 5:30 AM < f.petru...@virgilio.it.invalid 
> mailto:f.petru...@virgilio.it.invalid > wrote:
> 
> 
>         > >         Dear Developers,
> > 
> >     > 
>         > >         we are members of the ZEST research group (Zurich 
> Empirical Software
> >         Engineering Team) based at the University of Zurich and the Delft
> >         University of Technology. We are conducting an investigation on the
> >         diffusion of innovations and we focus on the adoption of new 
> > language
> >         features. Our research is focused on how API producers adapt their
> >         interfaces to introduce support for Java 8’s lambdas. During the 
> > course of
> >         our investigation, we manually inspected commons-fileupload, 
> > commons-lang,
> >         and commons-logging’s source code and documentation to understand 
> > whether
> >         Java’s lambdas have widespread adoption. We would like to have your
> >         feedback on our findings.
> > 
> >     > 
>         > >         Our study focuses primarily on Functional Interfaces and 
> Lambda
> >         Expressions as these new features were introduced by the Java 
> > language and
> >         adopted the Java JDK API, as they reduce implementation complexity, 
> > improve
> >         readability, offer performance benefits and improve security
> >         contextualization.
> > 
> >     > 
>         > >         Our analysis showed that commons-fileupload, 
> commons-lang, and
> >         commons-logging did not introduce compatibility with Java 8+ 
> > features,
> >         including Functional Interfaces and Lambda Expression. We would 
> > like to
> >         better understand as to why these APIs do not support newer Java 
> > language
> >         versions and their features.
> > 
> >     > 
>         > >         Our investigation showed us that in most cases API 
> producers do not
> >         migrate their APIs to newer Java Releases. Despite this, the API 
> > remains to
> >         be widely used by consumers on GitHub. Can you provide us with more
> >         information on this phenomenon?
> >         Did you and your team ever discuss the migration to new Java 
> > releases? If
> >         so, what did this discussion entail?
> >         What is the reason behind not migrating to a newer Java version?
> >         Did the introduction of new language features such as lambda 
> > expressions
> >         influence your decision in any way?
> >         Does your API plan on introducing support for lambda expressions in 
> > the
> >         future?
> > 
> >     > 
>         > >         We thank you for taking the time to answer our questions. 
> If you would
> >         like to be posted about the results of this study, please let us 
> > know!
> > 
> >     > 
>         > >         Kind Regards,
> >         Fernando Petrulio.
> > 
> >     >     >
>     >
> 
>         > >         [photo-logo]
> >         Fernando Petrulio
> >         Ph.D. Student University of Zurich UZH
> >         Department of Informatics
> > 
> >     > 
>         > >         [linkedin] https://www.linkedin.com/in/fernando-petrulio
> > 
> >     > 

[photo-logo]    
Fernando Petrulio
PhD Student University of Zurich UZH
Department of Informatics

[linkedin] https://www.linkedin.com/in/fernando-petrulio

Reply via email to