On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 7:13 AM Ben Nguyen <bennguye...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don’t believe the plan is or that the use of EJML should be permanent…. > There's no reason it couldn't be permanent. Obviously we want to give credit where it is due in all the appropriate ways. But the code is licensed so that others may incorporate it. It is hard to see any downside for the EJML team to gaining greater exposure and use by being shaded by Apache. That is probably what they want. Efficient matrix implementations are serious business. If you ask me, commons would be well within its mission by making EJML easy to find, use, and combine with other libraries of useful code. We would not necessarily be in the commons mission by developing our own sparse matrix factorization libraries. I feel exactly the same way about the JTransforms library, on the day that we get to that.
